Modelling Naturalistic Argumentation in Research Literatures
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper characterises weaknesses in the ability of current digital libraries to support scholarly inquiry, and as a way to address these, proposes services grounded in semiformal models of the naturalistic argumentation commonly found in research literatures. It is argued that a design priority is to balance formal expressiveness with usability. We summarise the requirements for an argument modelling scheme for use by untrained researchers, describe the resulting scholarly discourse taxonomy, contrast it with other domain modelling and semantic web approaches, before focusing on examples of computational services to support the filtering and analysis of the repository. 1
منابع مشابه
Modelling naturalistic argumentation in research literatures: representation and interaction design issues
This paper characterises key weaknesses in the ability of current digital libraries to support scholarly inquiry, and as a way to address these, proposes computational services grounded in semiformal models of the naturalistic argumentation commonly found in research literatures. It is argued that a design priority is to balance formal expressiveness with usability, making it critical to co-evo...
متن کاملModeling naturalistic argumentation in research literatures: Representation and interaction design issues
This article characterizes key weaknesses in the ability of current digital libraries to support scholarly inquiry, and as a way to address these, proposes computational services grounded in semiformal models of the naturalistic argumentation commonly found in research literatures. It is argued that a design priority is to balance formal expressiveness with usability, making it critical to coev...
متن کاملAn Ontology for Argumentation on the Social Web: Rhetorical Extensions to the AIF
A key area in the research agenda of modelling argumentation is to accurately model argumentation on the social web. In this paper we propose additional extensions to our ontology for argumentation on the social web (which integrates elements of the Argument Interchange Format and the Semantically Interlinked Online Communities project) for the purposes of modelling social and rhetorical tactic...
متن کاملUncertainty and Lack of Information in Persuasive Argumentation: An Abstract
In Human-Computer Interaction and Multi-Agent system argumentation is one of the key form of interaction. In these fields Agents have not either control or authority on the other. The only means they have to influence the behaviour of other consists in persuading them. The main aim of our research consists in modelling agents that can perform persuasive argumentation, exhibiting natural feature...
متن کاملThe Open University ’ s repository of research publications and other research outputs Contemporary educational argumentation : A multimodal perspective
In contemporary educational contexts there is considerable variation in how argumentation works and what forms and styles it takes. Influencing factors include the educational purpose and task, the level of education, and the discipline or curriculum subject in which it occurs. This paper offers a theoretical framework and a set of multimodal analytical tools which can provide a rich and system...
متن کامل